Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2026

Booking/Etraveli: EU General Court Upholds Commission’s New Template For Digital Merger Control

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The EU General Court's landmark Booking/Etraveli judgment validates the European Commission's power to block digital mergers based on entrenchment theories, even without horizontal overlaps or significant market share increases. This watershed ruling arrives alongside new Article 102 Guidelines and draft Merger Guidelines that reshape how dominant platforms must justify acquisitions and demonstrate competitive benefits in ecosystem markets.

BelgiumAntitrust/Competition Law

Introduction

The EU General Court’s (the "Court") judgment in Booking/Etraveli marks a watershed moment for digital merger control in Europe. On 9 September 2026, the Court upheld one of the European Commission’s (the "Commission”) most noteworthy recent merger prohibitions, validating an approach that does not require material market share increments or horizontal overlaps to prohibit a deal. The ruling lands in a broader context of regulatory change: the Commission has simultaneously adopted its first comprehensive guidelines on exclusionary abuses of dominance and published draft merger guidelines that promise a more receptive approach to pro-competitive consolidation. The Article 102 Guidelines and draft Merger Guidelines provide the framework in which Booking/Etraveli will now be applied – but it is the judgment itself that sets the template. For dealmakers and large firms active in digital markets, the result is a landscape of heightened risk but also greater opportunity for

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from