Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2022

The Intel Judgment: (Re)Balancing The Burden Of Proof

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Rebates are commonly used by companies to maximize sales. From an antitrust law perspective, such discount schemes are generally not problematic.

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

On January 26, the General Court (GC) of the European Union issued a judgment on remand,1 annulling the ?1.06 billion fine that the European Commission (EC) had imposed on Intel in 2009.

Companies commonly use rebates to maximize sales. From an EU antitrust law perspective, such discount schemes are generally not problematic. However, dominant firms may sometimes apply discounts in a way that distorts competition, for example when they are applied in a discriminatory or arbitrary manner or if they provide de facto exclusivity to the supplier. In this respect, which rebates can be considered lawful has been the subject of much controversy. The traditional rigid, formalistic approach that the European courts used to adopt regarding rebates granted by dominant firms could often punish healthy competition on the merits.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from