Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2014

Advocate General Wathelet In Huawei Technologies: Disappointing Opinion

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

Advocate General Wathelet’s disappointing Opinion in Huawei Technologies sets out a test that is divorced from reality.

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

Advocate General Wathelet's disappointing Opinion in Huawei Technologies sets out a test that is divorced from reality.

The application of competition and antitrust law to standard essential patents ("SEPs") is a matter of great debate in many jurisdictions.

There have been a number of significant developments recently in Europe with the recent adoption of two controversial decisions by the European Commission (Samsung and Motorola1) and the consideration of these issues in an Opinion by Advocate General Wathelet to the European Union's highest court in the current Huawei Technologies case.

On 5 April 2013, the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) referred a series of questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") in relation to litigation between Huawei and ZTE requesting guidance on when an application for an injunction brought by the holder of SEPs could amount to an abuse of a dominant position contrary to Article 102 TFEU.2 This reference

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from