Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 OCTOBER 2026

Why The Egyptian Competition Authority Rejected A Settlement Request After Conviction

The Egyptian Competition Authority (ECA) recently issued a decision that reflects its increasingly assertive enforcement approach. On 26 September 2026, the ECA’s Board of Directors rejected a settlement request from a food-sector company convicted and fined by the Economic Court for failing to respond to the ECA’s requests for information (RFIs) within the set deadlines. The decision confirms that the ECA now treats procedural non-cooperation as an enforcement priority in its own right, and that a conviction for such failure does not automatically lead to a settlement.

EgyptAntitrust/Competition Law

The Egyptian Competition Authority (ECA) recently issued a decision that reflects its increasingly assertive enforcement approach. On 26 September 2026, the ECA’s Board of Directors rejected a settlement request from a food-sector company convicted and fined by the Economic Court for failing to respond to the ECA’s requests for information (RFIs) within the set deadlines. The decision confirms that the ECA now treats procedural non-cooperation as an enforcement priority in its own right, and that a conviction for such failure does not automatically lead to a settlement.

The case came against the backdrop of the ECA’s stated enforcement priorities, which single out food commodities among the sectors warranting closer scrutiny given their reach across a broad segment of the population. During the examination, the ECA sent the company RFIs more than once. The company failed to provide the requested data within the required period, violating the Competition Law’s requirement that any

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from