Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2002

Judgement on Domain Name

Magnusson Wahlin Qvist Stanbrook
Explore more from Magnusson Wahlin Qvist Stanbrook

DenmarkIntellectual Property
Jeppe Brogaard Clausen
Jeppe Brogaard Clausen

The Danish international toy chain, Top-Toy A/S "BR" (the parent company of the Danish BR-Legetøj A/S), recently won a case in the Danish Commercial and Maritime Court against the IT company, Icom Data ApS, regarding the domain name, www.br.dk. Though the domain name was only registered and had never been used, BR was found to have an exclusive right to the domain name www.br.dk, and Icom was ordered to transfer the domain name to BR.

The Defendant, Icom, is an IT consultancy company established in 1997. In 1998, Icom registered the domain name www.br.dk. The company provides assistance in designing websites. The domain name www.br.dk was registered but never used.

The Plaintiff, BR, is an international toy chain and the holder of the well-known, registered trademark, BR, mainly known for toys and playthings. Presently, a total of 19 domain names have been registered for BR toys, including www.brleg.com, www.brleg.dk, www.brtoys.com, etc. During the court proceedings, market

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

EPO Enlarged Board Clarifies: Publicly Available Products Are Prior Art, Even If Irreproducible

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board has fundamentally altered the landscape of prior art assessment, establishing that products made publicly available before a patent filing date constitute prior art regardless of whether they can be analyzed or reproduced. This landmark decision removes the long-standing reproducibility requirement, making market availability alone sufficient to destroy novelty and significantly raising the stakes for timely patent filings.
European UnionIntellectual Property
Aera A/S
Aera A/S
Article

AI Training Meets Copyright Law: Munich Court Sides With GEMA Against OpenAI

On 11 November 2025, the Regional Court of Munich I ruled that OpenAI’s language models unlawfully used song lyrics by nine German authors. GEMA, acting as the collecting society, claimed that OpenAI’s models had memorised and reproduced copyrighted lyrics without permission. Comparable collecting societies across Scandinavia – such as KODA (Denmark) play similar roles in protecting authors’ rights and are closely watching this development.
DenmarkIntellectual Property
Aera A/S
Aera A/S
Article

AI And Copyright: What Are The Implications Of The Getty And Gema Cases For The Danish Corporate Sector?

Two recent European court cases—Getty Images vs Stability AI and Gema vs OpenAI—have delivered contrasting rulings on generative AI and copyright infringement, with significant implications for how businesses assess legal risks when using AI models. While one court found no infringement in AI training processes, the other ruled that memorized copyrighted content in model outputs constitutes unlawful reproduction, highlighting the urgent need for Danish companies to clarify their AI roles and imp
DenmarkIntellectual Property
Bech-Bruun
Bech-Bruun
Article

AI og ophavsret: Hvad betyder Getty- og Gema-sagerne for danske virksomheder?

To nye europæiske domme om generativ AI og ophavsret viser, at både træningsdata og AI-genereret output kan få afgørende betydning i kommende sager. Getty Images mod Stability AI og Gema mod OpenAI illustrerer, hvordan retsstillingen fortsat er uafklaret på tværs af jurisdiktioner. Hvad betyder disse afgørelser for danske virksomheder, der anvender eller udvikler AI-løsninger?
DenmarkIntellectual Property
Bech-Bruun
Bech-Bruun