In a recent appellate case in which our law office acted for the
successful party, the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal on,
inter alia, the ground that "Courts do not act in
vain".
In the appeal case, under consideration, the Appellant –
(an intervener) – filed an appeal against a decision of a
first Instant Court, dismissing the Appellant's application to
set aside chabra freezing orders and a receivership order, but in
the meantime, the ex parte freezing order and the receivership had
become absolute – (due to the non-appearance of the
Respondent) – and the assets under receivership, had been
sold by the receiver, pursuant to an order of the 1st Instance
Court and the proceeds of sale, were deposited with Court.