Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Cyprus Injunctions - Chabra Orders Against Non-substantive Defendants

Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC
Explore more from Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC

Normally, Courts will not issue a freezing injunction against a person who is not a party to the proceedings and against whom there does not exist a serious issue to be tried.

CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Normally, Courts will not issue a freezing injunction against a person who is not a party to the proceedings and against whom there does not exist a serious issue to be tried. The possibility, however, of issuing an interim injunction against a third party who is not a "substantive" or the "principal" Defendant and against whom there is no serious issue to be tried has been recognised in both English and Cypriot case law.

The General Principle:

These type of injunctions became known as "Chabra" orders after the well known precedent of T.S.B. Private Bank International S.A. ν. "Chabra" and Another [1992] 1 W.L.R. 231. The jurisdiction may be exercised where there is good reason to suppose that assets held or owned by a third party are in truth the assets of the injuncted principal Defendant (e.g. where the assets are held by the third party on a bare trust (or as nominee) for the defendant). The discretion of the Court may extend to a situation where the principal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from