Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2025

Chabra Injunction And The Test Of "Good Reason To Suppose"

Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C
Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C
Contributor
Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C

Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C

Soteris Pittas & Co LLC is a boutique law firm, in size only, focusing on the areas of law relating...

View firm profile
Explore more from Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C

The Appellate Court, inter alia, decided that the 1st Instant Court applied correctly the test, which was established and developed in English case law, starting with the leading case...

CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent Appellate case FInstella -v- Bakay and Recolta, which was handled by our office, on behalf of the successful party - (in co-operation with the English law firm FIELDFISHER LLP)- the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal of a party – (which had intervened in an Originating Application for Enforcement of an LCIA Arbitral Award, in order to apply to set aside extensive chabra freezing orders and a receivership obtained by our Client) – against the decision of the 1st Instant Court to dismiss the Appellant's application to set aside the ex parte chabra injunctions and receivership on, inter alia, the ground that such a party had a valid and legally enforceable pledge, over the shares of a Cypriot company, which were the subject of the chabra injunction and receivership.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from