Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2026

Supreme Court (SPC): How Should Compensation Be Determined For Continuing Infringement During Prior Litigation?

Company A, the patentee of the patent in question, filed an infringement lawsuit against Company B (including three affiliated entities) in 2007 (the "Prior Action"). In May 2013, the court of first instance found infringement, ordered Company B to cease the infringing acts, and awarded damages. Company B appealed, and the appellate court affirmed the decision in January 2015.

ChinaAccounting and Audit

Company A, the patentee of the patent in question, filed an infringement lawsuit against Company B (including three affiliated entities) in 2007 (the "Prior Action"). In May 2013, the court of first instance found infringement, ordered Company B to cease the infringing acts, and awarded damages. Company B appealed, and the appellate court affirmed the decision in January 2015.

Between July 2013 and July 2015, after the first-instance judgment in the Prior Action was issued, Company A obtained notarized evidence on multiple occasions, showing that Company B and Company C were manufacturing, offering for sale, or selling the accused infringing products. Company A filed another lawsuit (the present case), requesting that all defendants be ordered to cease infringement and pay damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

AFD China Newsletter is intended to provide our clients and business partners information only. The information provided on the newsletter should not be considered as professional advice, and should not form the basis of any business decisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from