Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 NOVEMBER 2011

Normal Service Resumed? Another Look At Cayman Freezing Orders

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

No sooner than "Gillies-Smith" appeared to rewrite the Cayman courts' approach to free-standing freezing orders (or Mareva injunctions), considerable doubt has been thrown on that decision.

Cayman IslandsWealth Management

Introduction

No sooner than Gillies-Smith1 appeared to rewrite the Cayman courts' approach to free-standing freezing orders (or Mareva injunctions), considerable doubt has been thrown on that decision. The recent judgment in VTB Capital Plc v Malofeev2 reemphasises the traditional principled objections to the grant of such free-standing freezing orders, particularly the issue of whether leave may be granted to serve a defendant outside the jurisdiction where there is no substantive cause of action against it in the Cayman Islands. The refusal to allow service on a non-resident defendant directly contradicts the decision in Gillies-Smith and signals a return to earlier jurisprudence.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from