Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2022

If It Looks Like An Attorney

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

In a recent judgment the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands confirmed that in-house counsel are "attorneys" under the Grand Court Rules for the purposes of taking steps on behalf of a body corporate...

Cayman IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent judgment the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands confirmed that in-house counsel are "attorneys" under the Grand Court Rules for the purposes of taking steps on behalf of a body corporate

In the recent Judgment of the Grand Court in Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited v Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (Unreported, 27 May 2022, Segal J), the Court grapples with the meaning of the "attorney" in the Grand Court Rules ("GCR") and more specifically with the question of whether in-house attorneys are "attorneys" for the purpose of taking steps in proceedings on behalf of their employer. References in square brackets are to paragraph numbers in the judgment of Segal J which can be downloaded here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from