Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2008

Interest Deductibility: Uncertain In Light Of Lipson?

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The Income Tax Act (Canada) distinguishes between interest paid or payable by taxpayers on account of a business venture and a personal venture.

CanadaTax
Brian Kearl
Brian Kearl
Lauchlin MacEachern
Lauchlin MacEachern
Author LinkedIn connections

The Income Tax Act (Canada) distinguishes between interest paid or payable by taxpayers on account of a business venture and a personal venture. Essentially, interest expense incurred on a business loan will generally be deductible to the taxpayer or, in some cases, may be capitalized. Contrast this treatment to personal loans, where interest on such loans is not deductible. As such, it is not hard to imagine the incentive to develop tax plans and to organize one's affairs in a manner which qualifies as much interest expense as possible as tax deductible.

Singleton1, prior to Lipson2, was the seminal case for this type of tax planning. In the Singleton case, the taxpayer was a partner of a law firm in Vancouver, B.C. The taxpayer had a significant amount of equity built up in his partnership account. In order to purchase a house, the taxpayer accessed his partnership equity. The taxpayer then borrowed money to replace his depleted partnership equity. The Canada

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from