Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2014

Galachiuk: TCC Clarifies Due Diligence Defence Under 163(1)

Subsection 163(1) of the Income Tax Act imposes a penalty of 10% on an amount that a taxpayer fails to report where there has been a previous failure to report.

CanadaTax

Subsection 163(1) of the Income Tax Act (the "Act") imposes a penalty of 10% on an amount that a taxpayer fails to report in his/her return where there has been a previous failure to report income in any of the three preceding taxation years.

The penalty under subsection 163(1) has been described as "harsh" due to the 10% federal penalty, a potential 10% provincial penalty, and the fact that the penalty may apply even where minimal or no additional tax is owing by the taxpayer (i.e., the tax relating to the unreported amount was withheld at source and remitted to the CRA).

In several cases, the courts have held that a taxpayer that is the subject of a penalty under subsection 163(1) has a due diligence defence. A taxpayer can satisfy the due diligence test in one of two ways: (i) By establishing that he/she made a reasonable mistake of fact (i.e., the taxpayer was mistaken as to a factual situation and the mistake was reasonable), or (ii) by establishing that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from