Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JANUARY 2023

"Checking The Box" Not Enough To Avoid Director's Liability For Outside Director

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A decision of the Tax Court of Canada has provided further insight into the duties of an "outside" director who wishes to rely on the due diligence defence to avoid a director's liability assessment...

CanadaTax

A decision of the Tax Court of Canada has provided further insight into the duties of an “outside” director who wishes to rely on the due diligence defence to avoid a director's liability assessment under the Income Tax Act  (the “Act”).

In Burnett v The Queen  (2022 TCC 99), the taxpayer was assessed pursuant to section 227.1 of the Act for unremitted payroll source deductions of Canadian Noble Cut Diamonds Ltd. (“CNCD”), of which he was a director. The taxpayer, who had previously been a director of numerous private and public corporations, viewed himself as an outside director, and did not have access to CNCD's bank account and was not a signing officer.

The taxpayer testified that at each board meeting he asked another director, who was president of CNCD and led its daily operations, about whether payroll source remittances were current. The response was always to the effect that all was up to date and there were no concerns.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from