Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2016

Zeligs v. Janes: Severing Joint Tenancy

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Joint tenancy is a common form of ownership for family holdings and is often used for estate planning purposes.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Joint tenancy is a common form of ownership for family holdings and is often used for estate planning purposes. The main benefit of a joint tenancy is the right of survivorship which provides that when one joint tenant dies, his or her interest in the property passes automatically to the surviving joint tenant(s). A recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal gives a good reminder that a joint tenant may, through his or her unilateral actions, unintentionally sever a joint tenancy, thereby converting ownership into a tenancy in common and extinguishing the right of survivorship.

The decision in Zeligs v. Janes, 2016 BCCA 280 (CanLII) considered whether funds withdrawn from a joint bank account by one joint tenant and then transferred to herself for her own use would sever a joint tenancy. In this case, Dorothy Burnett owned a property (the "Knox Road Property") jointly with her daughter, Diana Janes. Janes held a power of attorney for her mother and, in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from