Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MAY 2016

Section 50 Of The Planning Act Keeps Causing Real Estate Title Problems

A recent number of real estate claims to LawPro and title insurers has prompted another bulletin on careful title searching and the need to be aware of Planning Act traps.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

A recent number of real estate claims to LawPro and title insurers has prompted another bulletin on careful title searching and the need to be aware of Planning Act traps. A few such claims:

1. The husband owned one house and the wife owned the house next door. When they borrowed on one house, the lender insisted that both husband and wife own the house to be mortgaged. The lawyer added the wife to the title to the husband's house. Now, husband and wife owned one house and wife owned the other. When they decided to finance the wife's house, the lender again asked for husband and wife to own the mortgaged house. The lawyer added the husband to the title to the wife's house. The ownership was now identical and this new mortgage breached the act. However, both mortgages got paid off and now, the clients want to put new mortgages on both houses. Clearly title is merged and separate mortgages on two separate houses are not permitted without a severance consent. Care must

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from