Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2016

Relaxed Interpretation Of Act Restores Expired Lien

McLennan Ross LLP
Explore more from McLennan Ross LLP

Recent decisions suggest a trend in Alberta that equitable considerations may sometimes operate to avoid the strict interpretation of the Builder's Lien Act.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Corbin Devlin
Corbin Devlin
Tara Argent
Tara Argent
Author LinkedIn connections

This article originally appeared in the December 25, 2015 issue of The Lawyers Weekly.

Recent decisions suggest a trend in Alberta that equitable considerations may sometimes operate to avoid the strict interpretation of the Builder's Lien Act.

The most recent example is the decision of Master Prowse in Boulevard Real Estate Equities Ltd. v. 1851514 Alberta Ltd. [2015] ABQB 619. In this particular case, the defendant 1851514 Alberta Ltd. ("185") provided work and materials at the request of Boulevard Real Estate Equities Ltd. ("Boulevard").

The numbered company 185 was not paid and it registered builders' liens. After the liens were filed, 185 was contacted by Boulevard and request to remove the liens.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Ontario’s Mandatory Annual Holdback Release Starts In 2027: What Owners And Contractors Need To Know

Starting in 2027, all Ontario project owners with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, and most owners with contracts dating back to July 1, 2018, must start releasing statutory holdback to their contractors on an annual basis. This requirement is the latest in a series of construction payment reforms under Ontario’s Construction Act. It replaces the traditional model of retaining holdback until substantial performance. Owners and contractors who fail to comply with the notice and payment timelines face exposure to interest claims, payment disputes, and adjudication proceedings.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

Holdback Deficiencies And Mortgage Priority: Court Of Appeal For Ontario Clarifies S. 78(2) Of The Construction Act

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has resolved a critical uncertainty in construction law regarding how holdback deficiencies should be calculated when owners fail to retain statutory holdbacks. The decision addresses whether contractors who have already been paid can claim additional priority over construction mortgages, and establishes important boundaries to prevent double recovery while balancing the interests of all parties in the construction pyramid.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Aird & Berlis LLP
Aird & Berlis LLP