Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2018

Refresher On Extras And Back Charges: Impact Painting Ltd v Man-Shield (Alta) Construction Inc

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

During the course of a construction project, the question often arises as to what is a valid extra and what is a valid back charge.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

During the course of a construction project, the question often arises as to what is a valid extra and what is a valid back charge. These issues were discussed in some detail in the recent Alberta Court of Queen's Bench decision in Impact Painting Ltd v Man-Shield (Alta) Construction Inc.1

Man-Shield was the general contractor for the construction of the Laurel Retirement Community in Edmonton. Impact was hired by Man-Shield as a painting subcontractor. Upon completion of the project, Impact issued invoices for extras, which were disputed by Man-Shield. Impact registered a builder's lien and claimed $237,676.12. Man-Shield issued back charges to Impact that totalled $208,579.73. After calculating the amount already paid to Impact, the valid extras and the valid back charges, the court concluded that $57,397.86 remained payable to Impact, with interest from the date of the last invoice issued.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from