Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2015

Not So Fast: REDMA Amendments May Not Have Retrospective Effect

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

On May 29, 2014, the Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 received royal assent. It made significant amendments to the Real Estate Development Marketing Act, S.B.C. 2004 c. 41.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

On May 29, 2014, the Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 received royal assent. It made significant amendments (the "Amendments") to the Real Estate Development Marketing Act, S.B.C. 2004 c. 41 ("REDMA" or the "Act").

One such Amendment relates to a developer's ability to retain a purchaser's deposit not only for failing to pay a subsequent deposit but also for failing to complete the purchase. Another significant Amendment imposes a one year time limit on a purchaser's post-closing right of rescission. For further information about these and other significant Amendments, see our previous post on the subject here.

The question of the extent to which these changes apply to matters pre-dating when the Amendments came into force does not have a straight-forward answer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from