Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2023

Meaning Out Of Thin Air: How Courts Resolve Contractual Ambiguities

In a recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, the Court was tasked with determining whether certain costs related to an open-air atrium, ...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

In a recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, the Court was tasked with determining whether certain costs related to an open-air atrium, a rent free fixturing period, and leasing commissions were all "reasonable" expenses in connection with a sublease transaction. Its decision turned on principles of contract interpretation. Incidentally, the decision also provides a cautionary tale about paying close attention to how sublease space - or in fact any space - is described in an agreement.

The Facts:

In Pinnacle International Inc (One Yonge) v. Torstar Corporation, the Landlord and the Tenant had previously entered into a Lease for the entire third floor of a building. According to the Lease, the rentable area of the third floor was 65,534 square-feet, 18,827 of which was an open-air atrium.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from