The recent case of Graphic Packaging International
Canada, ULC v. 2477621 Ontario Inc. et
al.1 (Graphic Packaging) was described by the
Ontario Superior Court as “fundamentally a straightforward
construction case”. However, the case, which involved the
interpretation of a bespoke form of performance bond not typically
used in Canada, resulted in a less than a straightforward decision.
Respectfully, the Court made generalized statements regarding
certain principles of surety law with only limited analysis of the
underlying facts and issues, and without reference to the
applicable jurisprudence. Therefore, while it is important to
consider the fundamental issues of surety law discussed in the
case, the outcome of the case was largely driven by its unique
facts, such that its application should be limited accordingly.