Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2015

Interpreting A "Withholding Of Payments" Clause

A contract provision that permits an owner to withhold payment from a contractor is not a "penalty" clause.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

A contract provision that permits an owner to withhold payment from a contractor is not a "penalty" clause.

Penalty Provisions

The courts do not like, and typically do not enforce, "penalty" clauses. For this reason, liquidated damages clauses in favour of the construction owner generally have to be based on a "genuine pre-estimate of damages" in order to avoid the court striking the liquidated damages clause down.

No Further Payment Provisions

In a recent Ontario case, Ottawa Community Housing Corp. V. Foustanellas, the contractor argued that a clause providing that (in certain instances of default) "the obligation of the Owner to make payments will cease" was a penalty clause, and therefore not legally enforceable. The contractor was overbilling the owner, and consequently the owner acted on a clause in the contract that permitted the owner to "take work out of the hands of the Contractor." The owner then hired someone else to complete the work, but the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from