Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2015

Harvey Haber's May 2015 Helpful Commercial Leasing, Arbitration And Mediation Tips

It is not clear how far our courts will be willing to accept an argument that a breach of a covenant to repair by a landlord can amount to a fundamental breach entitling a commercial tenant to treat the lease as terminated.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Termination of Lease for Non-Repair

It is not clear how far our courts will be willing to accept an argument that a breach of a covenant to repair by a landlord can amount to a fundamental breach entitling a commercial tenant to treat the lease as terminated.

Which Breach?

Where the interference by a landlord in a tenant's premises is such that it goes beyond mere annoyance to the level of an "invasion of a tenant's peace and comfort", then our courts have held that it constitutes a breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment. Where, however, the degree of interference is so great that it would cause a reasonable person to vacate, then out courts have held that in such a situation, it constitutes a fundamental breach of the lease. Our courts continue to struggle with the particular fact situation before them in an attempt to categorize the nature of the interference.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from