Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2023

Greater Sudbury Begets Greater Responsibility: Supreme Court Expands Workplace Responsibilities For Construction Sites

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

The Supreme Court recently shifted the parameters of responsibility for workplace safety in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City).

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

The Supreme Court recently shifted the parameters of responsibility for workplace safety in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City). In a 4-4 split decision, the Court found the City of Sudbury liable for a fatal worksite accident caused by a contractor's employee, concluding that it breached its employer obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA)1.

What you need to know

  • This decision expands project owners' risk. An owner need not have control over its contractor's workers to be held strictly liable for safety violations under the OHSA.
  • Responsibility for workplace safety is a shared obligation. Owners and contractors must therefore work collaboratively to fulfil their "concurrent and overlapping" obligations to ensure provincial standards are met.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from