Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2016

Double Security For Lien Claimants?: The Stuart Olson Decision

Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Explore more from Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP

On September 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada issued reasons for judgment in Stuart Olson Dominion Construction Ltd. v. Structal Heavy Steel, 2015 SCC 43.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Alexander Holburn Beaudin & Lang LLP
Alexander Holburn Beaudin & Lang LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

On September 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada issued reasons for judgment in Stuart Olson Dominion Construction Ltd. v. Structal Heavy Steel, 2015 SCC 43. While in many respects the decision simply confirmed the remedies available to contractors and sub-trades under builders' lien legislation, there are significant unresolved questions with respect to how this decision will be applied in British Columbia.

The case involved a dispute between Stuart Olson, the general contractor for the construction of the new Investors Group Field football stadium in Winnipeg, and Structal Heavy Steel, one of its sub-contractors. Structal Heavy Steel filed a claim of builders' lien, which Stuart Olson discharged by posting a lien bond in court for the full amount of the claim. When the dispute remained unresolved, Stuart Olson applied to court for a declaration that it was free to use further funds it received from the owner without regard to any trust claims against those

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from