Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2014

Contractors Cannot Lien For Damages: Alberta Master Rules On Proper Subject Matter Of Builders’ Lien

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

An Alberta master’s decision examined the burden of proof in an application to reduce the amount of security posted to discharge a builders’ lien.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

An Alberta master's decision examined the burden of proof in an application to reduce the amount of security posted to discharge a builders' lien, and whether damages – such as losses that may not sufficiently relate to improvements to the land – may also be included in claim for a builders' lien. In Krupp Canada Inc v. JV Driver Projects Inc (Krupp), Master A.R. Robertson held that the applicant bears the burden of proof in applications under section 48 of the Builders' Lien Act (Act) to persuade that a lien should be reduced, even when security is provided. The court went on to find that a lien can only be claimed for work actually done to improve the lands and not for other damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from