Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2022

Construction Owners Take Note: Supreme Court Will Rule On Important OHSA Issue

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In Ontario (Labour) v Sudbury (City),[1] the Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that a construction owner may be liable for violations of Ontario's Occupational Health and Safety Act...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

In Ontario (Labour) v Sudbury (City),1 the Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that a construction owner may be liable for violations of Ontario's Occupational Health and Safety Act (the “OHSA”) on a construction project as an employer. On December 9, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to the City of Sudbury (the “City”) to appeal this notable decision.

The Facts

In 2015, the City entered into a contract with a general contractor, Interpaving Limited (“Interpaving”), to repair one of the City's water mains. While the City was the owner of the construction project, the contract between the City and Interpaving stipulated that Interpaving would assume control over the entire project, including ensuring that all health and safety requirements under the OHSA were met.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from