Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2022

Case Study: North Perimeter V. 6625844 Manitoba Ltd. Et Al., 2021 MBQB 94

The dispute in this case centered on a common theme in the construction industry – the parties' failure to document key terms in writing.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

The dispute in this case centered on a common theme in the construction industry – the parties' failure to document key terms in writing. As the parties were not able to resolve the many issues between them, a trial was held before Martin J. of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba. It is important to note that the party who was largely successful in this case had documentary evidence to support its position.

Facts

North Perimeter Construction Limited ("NPCL") and Russ Paterson ("Russ"), the owner of various companies associated with Northern Meat Services, had a long, mutually beneficial commercial relationship. Russ wanted to build a cold storage facility that would be owned by the defendant numbered company. This company was owned by the holding companies of Russ' two sons. Despite this arrangement, at all times, Russ was the mind and hands-on driver of every part of the project.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from