Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2015

Beware: Insurance, Indemnity, And Terms Not As They Appear

Landlords and tenants should always be thinking about the relationship between an obligation to insure and a lease’s indemnity clause...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Landlords and tenants should always be thinking about the relationship between an obligation to insure and a lease's indemnity clause so that the risk, should the "Premises" be damaged, is allocated as the parties intended.

Generally, where insurance is obtained for the benefit of one party, the obligation to insure operates as a waiver of liability in favour of the other party. However, in one recent case Deslaurier Custom Cabinets Inc. v 1728106 Ontario Inc., 2014 ONSC 5148 ("Deslaurier"), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that a tenant's covenant to insure may be limited by express provisions in the lease.

In Deslaurier, 1728106 Ontario Inc. (the "Landlord") entered into a lease with Deslaurier Custom Cabinets Inc. (the "Tenant") to carry on the business of manufacturing and sale of custom cabinets in Units 4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16 of the Building, containing a rentable area of 95,090 square feet (the "Premises"). As a condition of the lease, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from