Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2014

Atco Lumber And Impermissible Clauses In Statutory Rights Of Way

The B.C. Supreme Court's decision in Atco Lumber Ltd. v. Kootenay Boundary (Regional District) has raised questions about the validity of statutory rights of way.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

The British Columbia Supreme Court's recent decision in Atco Lumber Ltd. v. Kootenay Boundary (Regional District) has raised questions about the validity of statutory rights of way (SRWs) that aim to impose positive obligations on property owners.  The Atco decision is particularly important to municipalities, public utilities and other entities that regularly rely on the benefit of SRWs in order to operate their undertakings.

Overview

An SRW is a right in the nature of an easement that is available to certain authorized entities pursuant to the Land Title Act (LTA).  SRWs are generally used by government agencies to permit access over private lands for the purposes of facilitating the construction and/or maintenance of public works.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from