Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2014

Agricultural NetLetter - Wednesday, May 7, 2014 - Issue 299

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of a farmer who was convicted of stealing cattle and making a false or counterfeit mark on cattle.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

** HIGHLIGHTS **

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has upheld the conviction of a Saskatchewan farmer who was convicted of stealing cattle and making a false or counterfeit mark on cattle contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Code. Ten yearling Simmental heifers owned by a neighbouring farmer, all of which had a yellow dangle tag in one ear, and a radio frequency tag in the other, went missing. The heifers were subsequently found to have been sold by the farmer who was charged. When the heifers were located, they bore his ear tag, but none of the ear tags of the owner. The Court of Appeal agreed that it was "not within the realm of possibility, that all of those tags could have fallen out", and that it was reasonable for the trial Judge to conclude that the farmer who had been charged had removed the tags, and replaced them with his own. (R. v. Deck, CALN/2014-018, [2014] S.J. No. 223, Saskatchewan Court of Appeal)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from