Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2017

Agricultural Law Netletter - Thursday, December 7, 2017 - Issue 385

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The Ontario Court of Appeal has set aside the decision of a Justice of the Ontario Superior Court who refused to set aside a foreclosure order which resulted in a substantial winfall...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

HIGHLIGHTS

* The Ontario Court of Appeal has set aside the decision of a Justice of the Ontario Superior Court who refused to set aside a foreclosure order which resulted in a substantial winfall to a mortgage lender from the foreclosure of a farm. The value of the farm substantially exceeded the balance owing on the mortgage. Although the farmer, who had serious mental and physical illnesses, had failed to defend the proceedings throughout, the Court felt compelled to intervene to grant relief against foreclosure. The decision considers the elements involved in granting relief against foreclosure and in relation to the "winfall issue" the fact that a mortgage is intended to operate as security for the payment of a debt only. The Court found it unnecessary to deal with issues raised by the Superior Court Justice in relation to whether the Farm Debt Mediation Act applied. (Winters v. Hunking, CALN/2017-062, [2017] O.J. No. 6144, Ontario Court of Appeal)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from