Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 NOVEMBER 2014

Agricultural Law NetLetter - Friday, November 7, 2014 - Issue 311

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has overturned a damage award granted by a Provincial Court against the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, for violating a farmer's right of unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

HIGHLIGHTS

A Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has overturned a damage award granted by a Provincial Court against the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, for violating a farmer's right of unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court concluded that although an OSPCA inspector had conducted an unlawful search and seizure because he failed to obtain a warrant, his conduct was motivated by a genuine concern for animal welfare and lack of bad faith. Although s. 24(1) of the Charter does afford jurisdiction for a damage award if it is "appropriate and just", the Provincial Court awarded damages without considering the guidelines set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in determining whether the "appropriate and just" standard had been met. (Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals v. Hunter, CALN/2014-034, [2014] O.J. No. 5078, Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from