Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2015

Agricultural Law NetLetter - Friday, August 21, 2015 - Issue 330

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A Justice of the British Columbia Supreme Court has concluded that a marijuana growing operation in a private residence did not fall within the "farming" exclusion under the homeowner's insurance policy.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

** HIGHLIGHTS **

A Justice of the British Columbia Supreme Court has concluded that a marijuana growing operation in a private residence did not fall within the "farming" exclusion under the homeowner's insurance policy. The grow op was conducted by either the homeowner or his wife. The exclusion in the policy for the unlawful cultivation of marijuana did not apply because the house was not destroyed as a result of the grow op, but as a result of arson. The insurer was required to pay the loss. (Davidson v. Wawanesa Insurance Co., CALN/2015-019, [2015] B.C.J. No. 1701, Supreme Court of British Columbia)

** NEW CASE LAW **

Davidson v. Wawanesa Insurance Co.; CALN/2015-019, Full text: [2015] B.C.J. No. 1701; 2015 BCSC 1383, Supreme Court of British Columbia, S.C. Fitzpatrick J., August 10, 2015.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from