Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 DECEMBER 2012

No Or Nominal Damages For Minor Breaches Of Privacy In Canada

Townsend v Sun Life Financial, 2012 FC 550, confirms the Federal Court’s reluctance to award damages for trivial breaches of privacy under Section 16 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).

CanadaPrivacy

Townsend v Sun Life Financial, 2012 FC 550, confirms the Federal Court's reluctance to award damages for trivial breaches of privacy under Section 16 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). In this case, Sun Life Financial accidentally copied a letter containing sensitive medical information to the individual's insurance advisor. Sun Life Financial acknowledged the privacy breach in sending the letter.

The Court reiterated and followed its position in Randall v Nubodys Fitness Centres, 2010 FC 681 at para. 55 [Randall] that a reward for damages under Section 16 of PIPEDA should be made "only in the most egregious of circumstances." In assessing the seriousness of the breach, the Court considered the impact of the breach on the individual, Sun Life Financial's conduct, and whether Sun Life Financial benefited from the breach.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from