Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 AUGUST 2014

More On Damages Under PIPEDA By The Federal Court

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In Henry v Bell Mobility, 2014 FC 555, the Federal Court considered the extent of damages to which the Plaintiff was entitled when a Bell Mobility Customer Service Representative ("CSR") revealed certain information about his mobile telephone account to an unauthorized third person.

CanadaPrivacy

In Henry v Bell Mobility, 2014 FC 555, the Federal Court considered the extent of damages to which the Plaintiff was entitled when a Bell Mobility Customer Service Representative ("CSR") revealed certain information about his mobile telephone account to an unauthorized third person.   The release of the information amounted to a breach of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, SC 2000, c 5 ("PIPEDA").   The Plaintiff claimed that he suffered losses arising from the release of the information to the unauthorized third party, and sought:

  • damages in the amount of $49,500.00, including compensatory damages of $35,500.00;
  •  punitive damages of $5,000.00;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from