Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2013

Cautionary Tale For The Helpful Employee

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada has recently released a report of findings in connection with a complaint that an employee at a mobile phone company improperly altered a phone contract of a customer at the direction of an unauthorized party.

CanadaPrivacy

On February 22, 2013, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) released a report of findings in connection with a complaint that an employee at a mobile phone company improperly altered a phone contract of a customer at the direction of an unauthorized party.

The facts of the case, as reported by the OPC, were relatively straightforward. The stepson of a customer was authorized to use a phone on his stepfather's account. The stepson visited a mobile phone store and requested changes to his services. The stepson impersonated his stepfather. Bad on the stepson, perhaps, but the OPC concluded that the employee did not follow the mobile phone store's customer validation process. In particular, the employee did not request identification to authenticate the customer by means of two pieces of identification. The changes requested by the stepson generated a new three year contract. Trouble was that the stepson was not authorized to make those changes and the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from