Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JANUARY 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Beyond Borders: BC Court Issues Seminal Ruling On The Jurisdictional Application Of The Personal Information Protection Act

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In a much-anticipated decision that may have ripple effects in other jurisdictions, the British Columbia Supreme Court has provided clear guidance...

CanadaPrivacy

In a much-anticipated decision that may have ripple effects in other jurisdictions, the British Columbia Supreme Court has provided clear guidance on the application of the Personal Information Protection Act, SBC 2003, c 63 ("BC PIPA") to foreign organizations.

In Clearview AI Inc. v. Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, the Court upheld the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia's ("OIPC") order against Clearview AI Inc. ("Clearview"), a U.S.-based facial recognition company, in connection with Clearview's violations of BC PIPA.1

The Court's ruling establishes that BC PIPA applies to organizations outside of British Columbia ("BC") that have a "real and substantial connection" to BC. Although this finding appears to support a contextual analysis similar to the test applied when considering the application of the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, SC 2000, c 5 ("PIPEDA")

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from