Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2014

Allowing Ontario’s Privacy Tort To Develop In The Health Information Sphere — For Now

In the 1980's the Supreme Court of Canada pre-emptively ended the development of a common law tort of discrimination.

CanadaPrivacy

In the 1980's the Supreme Court of Canada pre-emptively ended the development of a common law tort of discrimination. The case, Seneca College v. Bhadauria, stands out as one of the lost opportunities in the development of the common law in Canada. The battle lines have re-emerged in the context of the development of Ontario's new privacy tort – intrusion upon seclusion. How it will play out is yet to be seen.

Bhadauria

Although the cases involving the tort of intrusion upon seclusion do not mention Bhadauria — that case casts a long shadow and is essential reading to understand what is currently at stake for those who seek to advance a common law privacy tort.

In Bhadauria, the plaintiff complained that she had been repeatedly discriminated by the defendant college on the basis of her ethnic origin. She had applied for 10 positions on the teaching staff of the college and had never been granted an interview. Bertha Wilson J.A., writing for a unanimous bench of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from