Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MARCH 2012

Merchant Beware: The Costs Of Misleading Advertising

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Although advertising campaigns which use flashy representations to grab consumers’ attention might be effective, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") recently ruled that they might also entitle those consumers to compensatory and punitive damages against the merchant.

CanadaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Although advertising campaigns which use flashy representations to grab consumers' attention might be effective, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") recently ruled that they might also entitle those consumers to compensatory and punitive damages against the merchant. In Richard v. Time Inc., the plaintiff instituted an action against the defendants Time Inc. and Time Consumer Marketing Inc. after learning that the "Official Sweepstakes Notification" that he had received in the mail (and which had induced him to mail back the enclosed "Reply Coupon" in order to claim his anticipated winnings, thereby also subscribing to Time magazine for two years) was in fact only intended to be an invitation to participate in a sweepstakes, and not confirmation that he had already won the sweepstakes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from