Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2023

What A Recent Court Of Appeal Decision Says About Data Breach Class Actions

The proposed class action involved a data breach where Uber was hacked by third-party cyber-criminals.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

One year ago today, we published a blog about the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench decision in Setoguchi v. Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18 in which a certification motion was dismissed. The proposed class action involved a data breach where Uber was hacked by third-party cyber-criminals.

We are noting that anniversary by providing our comments on the recently released appellate decision. We previously noted the court's finding decided that the nature of the personal information that was the subject of the data breach was not sufficiently sensitive to give rise to claim for damages. As a result, and in the absence of evidence showing harm to class members, the data breach alone did not form the basis for certification of the class action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from