Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2024

Vidéotron C 9238-0831 Québec Inc (Caféier-Boustifo)

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

This case arises in the context of a class action proceeding. Vidéotron appealed from a judgment refusing its request to modify the composition of the class to exclude...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Quebec Court of Appeal dismisses motion for referral to arbitration as untimely.

Facts

This case arises in the context of a class action proceeding. Vidéotron appealed from a judgment refusing its request to modify the composition of the class to exclude persons who had entered a contract containing an arbitration clause (the Motion).

On April 23, 2018, Caféier-Boustifo filed an application for authorization to institute a class action against Télébec, Bell Canada, Vidéotron and Cogeco Connexion Inc. in relation to allegedly abusive contract termination clauses in telecommunications services contracts.

Before the hearing on the authorization to institute the class action, both Bell and Cogeco filed motions for declinatory exception (preliminary motions) on the basis that their contracts contained arbitration clauses. The Superior Court granted the motions and declined jurisdiction over them and their clients.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from