Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2016

Undisclosed Fee Cases Continue To Attract Class Actions

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In the recently released decision of Finkel v. Coast Capital Savings Credit Union,1 the British Columbia Supreme Court certified an action seeking damages from Coast Capital in relation to undisclosed foreign currency charges.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Over the past few years financial institutions and companies in other perceived "deep pocket" industries, like telecommunications, have become targets for class actions in regard to fees charged that are alleged to have not been adequately disclosed. Many of these claims have been grounded in breach of contract and/or breach of consumer protection legislation. Most of these claims have been certified.

We previously reported on this emerging trend in 2014. See previous blog post here: Undisclosed Fees Continue to Attract Class Actions

The trend continues.

In the recently released decision of Finkel v. Coast Capital Savings Credit Union,1 the British Columbia Supreme Court certified an action seeking damages from Coast Capital in relation to undisclosed foreign currency charges. The plaintiff alleges that Coast Capital charged undisclosed surcharges to its members who made foreign currency withdrawals from their personal Coast Capital accounts through ATMs on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from