Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2020

Uber's International Arbitration Clause Confirmed Unfair By Canadian Supreme Court

The Canadian Supreme Court has confirmed that provisions imposed on Uber drivers requiring them to resort to international arbitration in the event of disputes were inequitable.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Canadian Supreme Court has confirmed that provisions imposed on Uber drivers requiring them to resort to international arbitration in the event of disputes were inequitable.

On 26 June 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the highly publicised case of Heller v Uber Technologies Inc. The decision may be significant for companies in the gig economy as it opens the door for individuals engaged with Uber to access the Courts and/or other tribunals to adjudicate any disputes, such as disagreements about the applicability of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the 'ESA').

In this case, an individual engaged as a UberEATS delivery driver filed a class action lawsuit in Ontario seeking a declaration that Uber and UberEATS drivers were employees for the purposes of the ESA, and were therefore entitled to the benefits afforded to employees under the legislation. Among other things, the claim sought declarations that Uber had violated the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from