Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2014

The U.K. Supreme Court Revisits Equitable Compensation In Commercial Transactions

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Trusts are widely used in commercial transactions. But, as creatures of equity, trusts raise issues that may not be immediately familiar to everyone who relies on them in the commercial world.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Trusts are widely used in commercial transactions. But, as creatures of equity, trusts raise issues that may not be immediately familiar to everyone who relies on them in the commercial world. Indeed, the interrelationship between equitable doctrines and remedies and common law principles and remedies is complicated. Fortunately, the U.K. Supreme Court has revisited the issue in its recent decision in AIB Group (UK) Plc v. Mark Redler & Co Solicitors, [2014] UKSC 58.

Background

The case arose out of a commercial loan transaction. A bank, AIB, lent £3.3m to Mr. and Ms. Sondhi (the "Borrowers"). AIB was to be secured by a first charge over the Borrowers' home, which was valued at £4.25m. There was an existing £1.5m charge over the home in favour of Barclays Bank that was to be redeemed before AIB's advance was completed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from