Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2013

The Test For Leave Under Part XXIII.1: Ambiguity Remains

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Ontario's statutory regime for secondary market liability came into effect in 2006 as a result of amendments to the Securities Act, which created a statutory cause of action for deficient market disclosure.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Ontario's statutory regime for secondary market liability came into effect in 2006 as a result of amendments to the Securities Act (Ontario) (OSA), which created a statutory cause of action for deficient market disclosure. Part XXIII.1 of the OSA creates a statutory cause of action against reporting issuers, their officers and directors, and related parties for misrepresentations made in secondary market disclosures. However, before such a claim can be brought, the plaintiffs must obtain leave of the court. The statutory test for leave is that: (1) the action must be brought in good faith, and (2) the plaintiffs must have a reasonable possibility of success at trial. In essence, the legislature granted the courts a gatekeeper function to control litigation and to ensure that only claims with some merit proceed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from