Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2007

The Supreme Court Of Canada’s Decision In "Danier"

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

The Supreme Court of Canada established three important principles in its decision in "Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc."

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Canada established three important principles in its decision in Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc.:

  • In updating a prospectus, the distinction between "material facts" and "material changes" is key: the Securities Act (Ontario) does not require issuers to update a prospectus by disclosing material facts that occur after a receipt for a final prospectus is issued.
  • The business judgment rule does not apply to protect disclosure decisions from second-guessing by the courts.
  • In securities litigation brought by way of class action, such as Danier, the usual costs rule in commercial litigation applies: the loser pays the winner’s legal costs.

Danier

was a prospectus class action – the first such case in Ontario to go all the way to trial. Danier offered shares in an initial public offering in May 1998. The prospectus for the IPO contained a forecast of anticipated revenue and earnings for the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. After the prospectus had been

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from