Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2014

The Second Opinion: Examination On Discovery Of Computers- No Fishing Allowed

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In "Desmarteau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation" 2013 QCCA 2090, the Quebec Court of Appeal established restrictive guidelines for the examination on discovery of personal computers, applying by analogy the rules governing Anton Piller orders.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Desmarteau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation 2013 QCCA 2090, the Quebec Court of Appeal established restrictive guidelines for the examination on discovery of personal computers, applying by analogy the rules governing Anton Piller orders.

In Desmarteau, the defendant sought and obtained in first instance, an order to permit its expert to examine the personal computer of the plaintiff to identify information relevant to the litigation. The first instance order instructed the expert to exclude matters covered by solicitor-client privilege. The Québec Court of Appeal reversed the first instance judgement and rejected the defendant's request to examine the computer because the request was premature, without sufficient justification and without adequate restrictions as to the examination.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from