Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2014

The Mazda 3 Lock – Alleged "Shoddy Goods" Are Not Always Defective

Following a common issues trial solely on questions of liability, Justice Viens of the Quebec Superior Court found that there was no liability with respect to the allegedly defective locking mechanism in Mazda 3 vehicles’ driver’s doors.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Following a common issues trial solely on questions of liability, Justice Viens of the Quebec Superior Court found that there was no liability with respect to the allegedly defective locking mechanism in Mazda 3 vehicles' driver's doors. While Quebec has the reputation of being one of, if not the most liberal, jurisdiction in Canada for its consumer protection legislation and class actions, this decision throws that reputation into question.

The class action was "authorized" (the equivalent of being "certified" in the common law provinces) against Mazda Canada Inc. ("Mazda") in 2010. The claim sought damages for an alleged design defect of the locking mechanism, for Mazda's wrongful behaviour following the discovery of the design defect, and for prohibited commercial practices in connection with the locking mechanism of Mazda 3 vehicles.  In January 2013, the action was bifurcated to permit the hearing on liability to proceed before the hearing on the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from