Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2017

The Limits Of Judicial Intervention Where An Administrative Decision Is Not Yet Complete

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Northern Cross (Yukon) Limited ("Northern Cross") submitted a proposal to a designated office of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (the "Board") for a multi-well exploration project...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

[...] absent exceptional circumstances, parties cannot proceed to the court system until the administrative process has run its course [Canada (Border Services Agency) v CB Powell Limited, 2010 FCA 61 at para 31, [2011] 2 FCR 332].

The recent federal court case of Northern Cross (Yukon) Limited v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 622, 2017 CarswellNat 2962 [Northern Cross] reaffirms the general principle that courts will be hesitant to intervene where an administrative decision is not yet finalized.

Background

Northern Cross (Yukon) Limited ("Northern Cross") submitted a proposal to a designated office of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (the "Board") for a multi-well exploration project in the Yukon. The designated office, after a lengthy and detailed process, referred the proposal to the Executive Committee of the Board for screening. The designated office did not make a final determination on the proposal. Instead, the proposal was

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from